1. Who is speaking?

2. When is it set?

3. Why bother writing it?

Is this section about:

1. An unbeliever?

2. A believer?

3. A conversion experience?

It is an unbeliever:

1. Consider his character

2. Consider his condition

3. Consider his captivity

4. Consider the connection of this section to the previous

1. Consider his character

He is carnal (v14)

This description can be used of a believer (1Co3:1,3,4)

In the context of Romans 7 would point more to an unbeliever (7:5;8:9)

2. Consider his condition

Controlled and owned by sin (7:14): “sold under sin”

The believer in contrast:

1. “is freed from sin” (6:7)

2. “sin shall not have dominion over you” (6:14)

3. “made free from sin” (6:18)

This control is apparent in 7:15,18,19.

3. Consider his captivity

This man looks for but cannot find the power to live for God

It is not simply that he has no power but it isn't there for him!

“I find not” (7:18)

He is in a complete “captivity to the law of sin...” (7:23)

This could hardly be true of someone “whom the son sets free”

4. Consider the connection of this section to the previous

Is 7:14-25 a different subject, unconnected to the previous section?

“For...” (7:14) – this section is connected to the preceding section.

In 7:5-13 we saw the problem encountered when the flesh comes into contact with the law of God, this results in rebellion, rejection and revulsion.

So is this the laws fault?

No says the apostle in 7:14, let me explain, the problem doesn't lie with the law it lies with me, that is with my flesh.

So this 3^rd section of Romans 7 is by means of explanation of the problems encountered by the unbeliever in 7:5-13.

So this 3^rd section of Romans 7 can hardly be about the struggles in the life of the believer if it is written to explain the problems encountered by the unbeliever!

It is a believer:

1. Consider his despair

2. Consider his desire

3. Consider his delight

4. Consider his deliverance

1. Consider his despair:

So what is the problem with this section being all about the unbeliever?

In a word the little title we have chosen for it: 'frustration'

There is a frustration running through this section

This is not a frustration we have detected so far in any of the sinners we have met in Romans:

Roms Chp 1: The Rotten Sinner:

Is his conscience racked with guilt and frustration at being unable to “do good” (7:19,21)?

Does this man spend a long night with a troubled conscience, racked with guilt?

Does this man get together for prayer with others to wrestle with sin in his life?

Does the rotten sinner of chp1 “hate” his sin (7:15) and how he is behaving?

“Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:” (Rom 1:31)

This mans conscience is burned out and utterly corrupted.

God has given him up.

His is a corrupted conscience.

He doesn't care that he hasn't made it.

He is marked by depravity of conscience.

Roms Chp 2: The Self Righteous Sinner

What about his conscience?

Is he caught up with frustration and self condemnation and criticism?

This sinner criticises others but not himself (2:3,5)

This sinner uses his conscience against others!

If I don't get to heaven then who will?

We can draw great comfort not from what we are before God but what we think we are before men!

He is too bust criticising others who haven't made it.

He is marked by distraction of conscience.

Roms Chp 2 + 3: The Religious Sinner

Is this sinner convicted and troubled by his own conscience?

This sinner seems more convicted and convinced of his own righteousness and acceptance before God on the basis of his race, his religion and his legal righteousness!

This man is confident (2:19)

This man is utterly convinced he has already made it.

All I have! All I do! All I am!

He is marked by deception of conscience.

2. Consider his desire

This man has a desire to do good and to please God (7:18-21)

This is not compatible with being an unbeliever (Rom 3:11).

3. Consider his delight (7:22)

If there is one verse I would point to in particular in this section to indicate that this man is not an unbeliever it would be v22.

This is a man with the character of the blessed man of Psalm 1.

Recall that such a delight in the law of the Lord has as its consequence even in OT days: roots, shoots and fruits (Ps 1:3).

Do we suppose then that in Roms 7 we have a fruitful unbeliever?

Not only is this the character of the blessed man of Psalm 1 but it is by contrast not the character of the ungodly man: “the ungodly are not so” (Psalm 1:4)

Not only does the man of Roms 7:22 “delight in the law of God” but he does it after the “inward man” cf. 2 Co 4:16.

In other words at the heart of this man is someone spiritual, a man trying to please God, but failing.

4. Consider his deliverance (7:24,25)

In this mans deliverance we might be tempted at first reading to consider this the story of an unbeliever, ie from 7:14-23 we have his struggle and in 7:24,25 we have his deliverance and then in chp 8 we have the Christian life.

Notice from what and to what he is delivered!

Look at how this section ends:

“So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.” (7:25)

In other words this deliverance is not from the presence of the flesh but rather is a deliverance to a place of power over the flesh.

So the change that happens at the end of this section does not wipe away the struggle of 7:14-25, relegating it firmly to the past, to pre-conversion life but rather this change / deliverance brings about the possibility and expectation of victory.

This deliverance is not a removal out of but rather a victory over the struggle.

So who is this all about?

How can we fit all of these features together?

Features of an unbeliever:

1. Consider his character

2. Consider his condition

3. Consider his captivity

4. Consider the connection of this section to the previous

Features of a believer:

1. Consider his despair

2. Consider his desire

3. Consider his delight

4. Consider his deliverance

Could we bring both of these lists together in 1 kind of person.

Could we have here a conversion experience?

Is this a transition section? What about when?

This will depend upon who we think this section is about!

But consider:

1. The change in tense to the present tense in 7:14ff

2. If this section deals with the past struggle of the pre-conversion life then what exactly is the point to it? Who is going to read this section? Is this epistle not written to believers? If so then this would be a description of the struggle you don't have!

3. If this section is all about the struggle of the believer, then what is the deliverance about (7:24,25) and why the contrast in Roms 8?

I suggest that this section isn't about a time at all but rather a truth

It is the truth of the flesh and how it impedes our service for God.

That is our present experience, hence the present tense and the features of the believer.

The flesh itself is never converted, hence the language of the unbeliever.

Victory in the battle is possible and is expected and hence the deliverance in 7:24,25 and the transition to chp 8.

https://graceinchrist.org/romans

Notes from a message preached by Dr J Stewart Gillespie At Bridgend Gospel Hall New Cumnock To listen to the MP3 recording of this message click here Chapter 6: 4 reasons we do not continue in sin: 1.Dead to sin 2.Alive to Christ 3.Serve another 4.Sin remains sin The bulk / the biggest of these 4 reasons presented in chapter 6 was: 'I serve another' which runs from about verse 12 to 20. Chapter 7 continues where chapter 6 left off Chapter 7 looks at what stops me from living the life I ought to live, a life that really counts for God and for eternity, The believer has 3 great enemies: 1.The World 2.The Flesh 3.The Devil cf. James 3:15; Psalm 17:12-14 Consider Moses and his rod used against Egypt – the world, the serpent – the Devil and Amalek – the flesh Consider David in 1 Samuel 17 – up against Goliath marked by 666, Saul and his carnal advice and the world in the form of the Philistine army Come to Romans 7 you would hardly know we had 3 enemies, only 1 mentioned – the flesh! Why the is it that the flesh comes in for such special attention here? 1.The Devil – smarter enemy: the 'angel of light', whispering in your ear: 'this is the way...let me show you a better way...don't listen to the preacher...never mind your bible..you needn't get rid of that sin, just cut it down a bit and if you can't cut it down a bit, just pretend you have, no one needs know...you can handle it.' 2.The World – would be a bigger enemy 3.The Flesh – the weakest enemy! Paradoxically the most significant! It is the weakest link in the chain! The flesh is the most vulnerable! The flesh becomes the final common pathway of all attack on my spiritual progress! So then if I didn't have the flesh: 1.Satan would be unable to gain a foothold in my life? Correct! Consider the words of Christ: “The prince of this world cometh and hath nothing in me” (John 14:30) 2.The world would have no appeal to me? Correct! Consider 1 John 2:16: “all that is in the world the lust of the flesh...” 3.Sin would have no appeal to me? Correct! (Rom7:5) When we use our bodies / lifes to act / speak / serve, think of: 1.The Cause of the action: Is it “in the flesh,” is it the kind of thing an unsaved person would do? Is it just fulfilling natural desires? 2.The Consequences of that actions: God desires that all actions and service for Him lead me deeper into “holiness” (6:19,22) 3.The Conclusion (6:23) – does it lead to death? Do the results continue with positive significance after death, “unto eternal life”? It is through the flesh Satan will attack me! An unsaved person is very much in: 1.The Power of Sin (Rom 6) 2.The Power of Satan (Eph2) 3.The Power of the Flesh (Rom7:5) Yet a man will rarely commit a sin that he does not enjoy! So Satan will act on the flesh, the natural appetites, for a buzz, a good time, a thrill. The world will appeal to: materialism, sexual appetite, natural desires: “the lust of the flesh, lust of the eyes, the pride of life.” Beware of blaming your sin on the Devil! God doesn't! God holds me responsible for my own sin! A man generally will enjoy his own sin: David – acted and fell on sexual desire Samson – sexual desire was his downfall Nabal – gluttony Judas – love of money, Satan entered into him and yet Judas fell because of his own greed and materialism. He had kept the bag and stolen from it and now he sells the Lord for 30 pieces of silver! A sin Satanically designed to appeal to Judas' flesh! 7:1-4 – Freedom from Law 7:5-13 – Failure of Flesh 7:14-25 – Frustration with Flesh How does the flesh hold me back? 7:5 – The Flesh Rebels against God 7:6 – The Flesh Restricts God 7:7 – The Flesh Replaces God The Flesh Rebels Against God (7:5) What is the response of the flesh to God? To His Word? To His Law? This verse is here that I might be able to discern the action and reaction of my own flesh to Gods Word. Does the flesh respond to Gods Word by: (a)The flesh gets information from the law? The flesh sitting back, minding its own business, is informed about sin by the law, and finds itself drawn to do what it never thought to do before? I don't think that is it at all. There is something far more active in the relationship between the 2 in verse 5: “the passions of sins” (v5), this is the flesh pursuing sin with a passion! Consider how the 'flesh' responds to Gods Law / Gods Word: i.Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen19) – the men rebelled against Gods Word from Lot: 'who do you think you are?' Who are you telling what to do?' The flesh responds with rebellion against God and His Word. ii.Synagogue of Nazareth (Luke 4) – The Word of God preached, an opportunity to respond to the gospel, if you don't respond then I'll turn to the Gentiles! Remember Elijah and the widow of Zarephath, remember Elisha and the Shunammite! What was their response? We never thought of that before? We'll need to go home and discuss this with our Rabbis? No the response of the flesh was that of rejection – took Him to the brow of the hill to cast Him off. iii.Calvary – man responds in the flesh with revulsion: “hated without a cause” He was “despised and rejected of men...” they cried “crucify Him” (b)The flesh is not simply informed by the law rather it is surely clear the response of the flesh is that on inflammation! Why does this happen? Every person has: 1.The flesh – which rejects God (Rom 8:7) – Detests God 2.A Conscience (Rom 2) – which detects God As soon as the conscience detects God; in moral values eg Sodom and Gomorrah, in His Word eg Luke 4 or in Person – the rejection of Christ. I need the power of the Holy Spirit to overcome all of that! Beware of a response to the Word of God that: rebels, rejects, revolts – that is the response of the flesh. The Flesh Restricts God (7:6) The flesh wants to turn the reality of relationship into the routine of religion We have seen previously that service for God can become a dry, dismal, dead, formal thing, that comes out of: Responsibility Obligation Duty This is not the motive for true Christian service Psalm 40:8 “I delight to do thy will O my God, yea thy law is within my heart” D – Desire E – Enjoyment L – Love I – Intensity G – Glory of God H – Heart T – Total Commitment To serve the way God wants me to serve I need: 1.Passion to Serve (7:1-4) 2.Possibility / Ability to Serve (7:5-13) 3.Power to serve (7:14-25) The flesh desires to change that service into a cold legality / formality (7:6) It is possible to draw a certain comfort / consolation from the repetition of form. The flesh likes formality – it keeps God at a distance. Indicators of formality: we become caught up with: 1.The Processes of religion: “I hate, I despise your feast days, and I will not smell in your solemn assemblies.” (Amos 5:21) 2.The Places of religion: “But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple.” (Mat 12:6); Matt 24:1: the church / the hall! 3.The People of religion: “Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.” (Luke 3:8) cf. “Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.” (1Co 1:12) “For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?” (1Co 3:4) The Flesh Replaces God (7:7) Of all the commandments to pick in this verse why pick: “thou shalt not covet” ? Why that one? Are there not more important commandments? More serious laws? What about the 1st table of the law? Sins against God? Did you notice that “thou shalt not covet” is by way of illustration of “lust” (v7) – in other words it is covetousness that makes lust sinful. The problem with lust is, it is a form of covetousness. Lust – the product of the flesh, sets my heart on what it ought not to be set upon. Lust is sinful because it takes my heart away from where it ought to be. Consider how covetousness lies at the root of so many sins: 1.The root sin of the flesh – covetousness 2.The root sin of Satan – covetousness: Isa 14:12-13; Ezek 28:16 3.The root sin of the world – covetousness: 1 John 2:16 4.Idolatry is covetousness (col 3:5) 5.Theft is the practice of covetousness 6.Adultery is sexual covetousness Covetousness is therefore presented in scripture as: 1.The root of all evil (1 Tim6:10) 2.The impediment to entering into heaven (Matt 19:24) 3.The alternative to Holy Spirit filled living (Col 3:2) 4.The seminal / root sin behind Satan, the World and the Flesh. 5.Responsible for bringing Gods judgement upon His people (Isa 57:17) 6.The sin of displacing God from my heart and putting something or someone else in His place: Ps 119:36; Ezek 33:31; Heb 13:5. Covetousness is thus the Seminal sin: The Divine definition of sin expounded in the 10 commandments, exemplified throughout Israels history, exposed in times of Divine judgement upon His people and explained in scripture hinges upon Gods abhorrence to and utter intolerance of covetousness, that is the revulsion of God towards a created being becoming distracted by or occupied with anything other than God. This is a most dangerous sin committed when it is committed against the One who describes Himself as a “jealous God.” When I apply this to my life, the insight which it brings is little short of mind blowing: i.Every unnecessary shopping trip ii.Every distracted hour iii.Every wasted evening on the TV / internet iv.Every pre-occupation with material gain v.Every social event which takes priority over the spiritual Becomes an act of exceptional sinfulness. https://graceinchrist.org/romans

Taken from a message preached at Bridgend Gospel Hall New Cumnock by Dr J Stewart Gillespie To listen to the MP3 recording click here “Shall we continue in sin?” (Rom6:1) We considered 4 reasons we don't continue in sin: 1.We are Dead to Sin (6:1-6) 2.We are Alive to Christ (6:5-11) 3.Because I Serve Another (6:12-20) 4.Because Sin remains Sin (6:21-23) Because I Serve Another: We thought about this practically Consider how the whole body is used in service, start from the top: 1.Our master (6:12) – Our Head 2.Our mortal body (6:12) – Our Human Desires / Lusts of the Body 3.Our members (6:13) – Our Hands 4.Our motive (6:17-19) – Our Heart 1.Our master (6:12) – Our Head Who is in charge? Who is my master? We chose our master! There are only 2 possibilities: i.Sin (5:21) ii.Christ (5:21; 6:10,11) Who is my head in this action? I no more control sin and Satan than I control Christ and righteousness. Some thought they could control sin: i.Noah and his wine – Lost his dignity ii.Lot's wife and a love for the world – Lost her home, family and life iii.Achan and materialism – Lost his life iv.Solomon and his wives – Lost his Kingdom v.Samson and his fornication – Lost his life vi.Judas and his love of money – Lost his soul Who exactly was in control? We have a great advantage here, we are able to look back on these biblical characters and take in the whole scope and panorama of their life! Our freedom lies in our ability to choose not in our freedom from the consequences of those decisions we make! 2.Our mortal body (6:12) – Our Human Desires Know your mortal body What is driving the activities of my mortal body? The body itself was created by God and has God given desires that are good and right: i.Appetite for food ii.Thirst iii.Sexual desires iv.Appreciation of beauty v.Love of art Our bodies are subject to our human nature and that nature is a fallen human nature corrupted by sin – referred to as the “flesh” The flesh constantly pulls me in the direction of gratifying the natural desires of the body, those desires are physical and earth bound and keep me tied to earth. Only with conversion and the power of Gods Spirit can I rise any higher that the desire to simply satisfy the natural desires of the body and only with His Spirit do I really appreciate that there is anything beyond the material to aim for and desire! Rom 8:5-13 The desire and goal of the believer goes beyond simply enjoying the stimulation of bodily appetites satisfied: Rom 6:19, 22 – we have fruit to bring for God – our goal is “holiness”! Is it the flesh driven by “lust” which is using: i.My hands for its deeds? ii.My eyes for its satisfaction? iii.My lips for its message? 3.“Our members” (6:13) – Our Hands Know your members The emphasis here is on outcome, not simply actvity! what am I actually achieving? Consider Mary and Martha (Lk10:38-42) Paradoxically when we apply the teaching of this section we may find that to be truly productive in the things of God we need to stop doing some things as we consider what they are actually achieving! I am a believer in that principle, of stopping service in a particular sphere as well as starting it! (Matt10:14; Mk6:11). “Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin... your members as instruments of righteousness unto God... whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?...as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity; even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness.” (Rom 6:13-19) We are looking at outcome not only occupation! Outcome in terms of “righteousness” - does it promote righteousness and “holiness” - does it further my pursuit of deeper holiness to God and encourage others in their pursuit of holiness, and “unto God” - is it acceptable to God? But you say I am busy! Busy but barren? Tests of worth / value: 1.What is the cause of my actions / activities (6:12-13). Is sin and the flesh the cause or is God the cause of this kind of action / activity / these words? 2.What is the character of my actions? Could I categorise it as “righteous” (v13) and consistent with Gods Word (v18) or is it “unrighteous”? 3.What are the consequences of this action (v19)? Where does it lead to? Is it “unto iniquity” (v19) or is it “unto holiness” (v19). 4.What about the conclusion of these actions? Do they end in death and with death (v16,21) or do these actions have eternal and enduring consequences (v22)? 4.Our motive (6:19) – Our Heart Surely not more about service? Surely this all isn't yet another message about doing more for God? I recall as a young believer developing a reaction of 'not another message about what we are meant to be doing for God' It is all very well speaking about service, exhorting to serve, talking about: 1.Responsibility 2.Obligation 3.Duty To serve but this can leave us cold and uninspired! Some of the people to whom Paul was writing had known most of their life about: 1.Responsibility 2.Obligation 3.Duty as a motive for service, but this failed to achieve the desired result in their life and in the life of the apostle. They knew “the law” (7:1), they knew all about their responsibility, obligation and duty under the law to serve God, but this is not the kind of service that Paul is speaking about in chp 6 to 8 of Romans. 1.Responsibility 2.Obligation 3.Duty Simply spell ROD – and this becomes a rod for our back. True service for God, true Christian service for God is not motivated, is not dynamised by have to. For true service I must move from: 1.Responsibility 2.Obligation 3.Duty To the dynamic of true Christian service. Consider the motivating principle behind the service of Christ for God: “Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and sin offering hast thou not required. Then said I, Lo, I come: in the volume of the book it is written of me, I delight to do thy will, O my God: yea, thy law is within my heart.” (Psa 40:6-8) His service was motivated by 'delight' and not by 'duty'! from: Desire Enjoyment Love Intensity Glory of God Heart Total commitment This is the essence of true Christian service, motivated by delight rather than duty. To serve in that way I would judge that I need 3 things: 1.A Passion to serve God 2.An Ability / Possibility to serve God 3.A Power to serve God In chapter 7 I see: 1.A Passion to serve God (7:1-4) 2.An Ability / Possibility to serve God (7:5-13) 3.A Power to serve God (7:14-25) 1.A Passion to serve God (7:1-4) means Freedom from the law 2.An Ability / Possibility to serve God (7:5-13) – in contrast of the failure of being “in the flesh” 3.A Power to serve God (7:14-25) – in contrast to Frustration. Therefore in Romans 7 I also have: 1.Freedom (7:1-4) 2.Failure (7:5-13) 3.Frustration (7:14-25) Looked at positively we see: 1.A Passion to Serve (7:1-4) 2.A Possibility to serve (7:5-13) 3.A Power to Serve (7:14-25) Chp 7:1-4 details a service born out of the passion of relationship A Passion to Serve - Freedom (7:1-4) i.Death releases from the law (v1) "The law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth" - the principle stated The rule or dominion of law extends only to death, as does sin (Rom5:12) In eternity there is no sin and can be no sin for there is no law either! On the surface, a point that is straight forward enough! But the apostle seems to chose a very complex parable as the means of conveying this truth. So complex that some would suggest that Paul has bitten off more than he can chew! That he has mad a bit of a mess of the illustration! In the chapter the believer is freed (7:4), just like the woman but it isn't the woman who dies it is her husband! But the parable illustrates something more than just the basic truth! So some have said the parable is a bit mixed up! A kind of mixed metaphor! Maybe Paul has overstretched himself! Others holding to the inspiration of the Word of God wouldn't maybe just go as far as saying that but would perhaps tacitly acknowledge it by saying, 'don't look too deeply into the parable,' or perhaps that the parable is only meant to illustrate the basic truth, perhaps indicating that underneath the surface the whole illustration is a bit of a mess! But this is the inspired Word of God and "not one jot or title shall pass away" "the Word of God is living and powerful..." Interestingly there are plenty of simple examples that Paul could have used to illustrate his point that the rule of law extends only to death and then law has no more demands upon us: a)Ahithophel - was he ever called to account for betraying the Lord's anointed? No he wasn't! Why? He hung himself! b)Naomi's two sons were they ever dealt with by the law and put out of the congregation of Israel for marrying Moabite girls? No! Why? They both died in Moab! c)Eli's two sons Hophni and Phinehas were they ever broad before the law for fornication? No! Why? They both died in battle! d)Samson and his fornication and adultery? But he doesn't chose a simple illustration, for as we shall see a simple example of this principle just would not have done, it would have been critically lacking in at least 2 perhaps 3 key areas. Pauls example illustrates at least 4 key principles: i.That death releases from the law ii.That in certain circumstances the death of another releases me from law iii.My relationship with another is critical in enjoying that release from law iv.Being released from law by death I am free to serve another That death releases from the law (v1) "The law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth" - the principle states The rule or dominion of law extends only to death, as does sin (Rom5:12) The principle stated is simple enough That in certain circumstances the death of another releases me from law(v2,4) Death releases me from the rule of law In the parable however the death is not my death, the death of the woman, but the death of another! Has Paul got mixed up? Actually this point is quite consistent with the context of Romans so far In chp 3+4 we came into blessing; the blessing of justification by faith, through death, the death of another! In chp 5 Divine Grace was poured out, through the death of another. In chp 6 our consecration to God was made possible because of our identification with Christ in His death – the death of another. Not only is it the case that death frees from the law but that death is significantly the death of another! Notice how that release by death occurs. Our simple illustrations would again be inadequate here. This is not release from the law in the same way that perhaps Hophni and Phinehas, Ahithophel, Naomis sons or Samson were released from the law. This is not the release of a guilty party because of the weakness of the law, unable to pursue the sinner beyond death. In our parable, significantly, it is the release of a guiltless individual who is now regarded as having fulfilled all legal obligations and death has now brought the claims of law to an end. This is the release of the righteous rather than the unrighteous! “For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.” (2Co 5:21) “Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.” (Rom 3:28) My relationship with another is critical in enjoying that release from law My relationship with another who is dead to the law in certain exceptional circumstances can affect my status before the law too! The death of another to the law can release me! I think in the context of Roms 4 to 6 this is highly significant! The nature of that relationship is also very interesting: marriage relationship! Right the way through the NT scriptures the relationship between Christ and His church is consistently viewed as a marriage relationship: (Eph 5:24ff; Rev21). In verse 4 we are "dead to the law" but it is by the "body of Christ" - the death of another! Notice the logic of verse 4: “Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God” Notice that nothing less than the “body of Christ” is needed to break me free from the demands of the law! The theme of redemption in scripture: the person of Christ, the work of Calvary, the sacrifice of the lamb, the sufferings of Christ (Ps22; Ps69; Isa53) all of this mighty work and sacrifice impacts upon my life at this point! To release me from that which binds me that I might be free to “bring forth fruit unto God.” What is this fruit? “But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.” (Rom 6:22) Holiness is no add on to Christianity Holiness is no after thought on Gods part to Christian experience Holiness is the very essence of Christian experience! Holiness is the impression of Calvary upon my being! Being released from law by death I am free to serve another In this complex parable of death releasing us from the law we see illustrated a point that could not be illustrated by a simple example of the death of the accused releasing him from the rule of law: (a)Ahithophel - what happened next? - Nothing he's dead. (b)Naomis' two sons - what happened next, after they were released from the law? Nothing - they were dead! (c)Eli's two sons - what happened to them next after they had been released from the law? Nothing - they were dead. But in the parable of Romans 7 after the release from the law there is a 'what happened next...' The woman released from the law is ready to move on and be married to another (7:4) And in our case: "that we should bring forth fruit unto God" (7:4) So this death is not simply an end but a beginning! Only because of the complex nature of this illustration is this point possible! Some take 7:1-4 to indicate that divorce and remarriage effectively exclude people from assembly fellowship (7:3) That interpretation sheds more light on the thinking of those who teach it than it does on the teaching of scripture on divorce and remarriage! The teaching in this section relative to the woman marrying another is whilst she is "bound by the law." There is no provision in the law for operation of Divine Grace. Those who draw their teaching on divorce and remarriage from this section likewise draw no provision from Divine Grace. The conclusion of this section brings us to our true standing today of being "dead to the law" (7:4) and in our dealings with men and women we must likewise recognise that there is likewise "therefore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus." There is good indication elsewhere that people from a background of divorce and remarriage were received into assembly fellowship: 1 Tim2; 1 Co7, John 4. Salvation isn't the end it is the beginning! Once you are save, you haven't 'done it' but rather God has 'begun it.' https://graceinchrist.org/romans

Notes from a message preached on Romans Chapter 7 - The Battle for Holiness by Dr J Stewart Gillespie There are 3 great enemies of the believer (James 3:15): 1.The World 2.The Flesh 3.The Devil Romans 6 the apostle speaks on the subject of consecration, of a life given over wholly to the service of God, particularly 6:12-20. As the apostle turns to look at impediments to that consecration in chap 7 it is to the flesh that he devouts this section to!

The Devil may well be a smarter enemy The world may well be a bigger enemy but The flesh is the weakest enemy and paradoxically therefore perhaps the most significant! The flesh provides the final common pathway for the attack of the other two: 1.If it were possible to remove the flesh then the Devil would be unable to gain a foothold in my life? Is that correct? Consider: “Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.” (Joh 14:30) 2.If it were possible to remove the world then the Devil would be unable to gain a foothold in my life? Is that correct? Consider: “All that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, the pride of life...” (1Jo2:16) 3.If it were possible to remove the flesh then sin would be unable to gain a foothold in my life? Is that correct? Consider Rom 7:5, 23. The flesh then is the final common pathway of the world, sin and the Devil. A hit on the flesh scuppers the effects of all 3! One of the greatest discoveries, practically in the Christian life is that the battle to be fought is primarily internal rather than external. There is within my person – 2 distinct pulls: 1.Flesh – pulls to the physical, the material, the sensual, ties me to earth, self ward 2.Spirit – pulls to the spiritual, ties me to heaven, God centred The pursuit of the one is the persecution of the other Very practical, I need to sit down and analyse my behaviour and ask does this pursuit / behaviour promote the one or the other (6:13) That will empower me with a level of discernment beyond mere rules or 'what's the harm in it?' Gods desire for you is not simply to preserve you from committing gross evil but it is the active pursuit of holiness: 6:19,22. This appreciation of the battle is critical in the pursuit of holiness. The High Priest dressed in garments of glory and beauty had: (1)Written on his heart – on the breastplate, the names of the 12 children of Israel. Consider his sympathy. (2)Written on his shoulders – on 2 stones, the names of the 12 children of Israel. Consider his support. (3)Written on his head, upon his miter – holiness to the Lord. Here is the highest calling and ambition of the High Priest: Holiness. To miss that goal is to miss the point to our salvation! Not service, not sacrifice but sanctification!

Romans 7 then is the front line in the battle for holiness That front line is internal and not external If I view my spiritual battle as primarily external then I will pursue / be dominated by certain ideas:

1.Separatism – because – you are the problem, you are the hindrance to my spiritual growth – this is rarely the case. Often behind schism lies pride! You're my problem! Usually I'm my problem! 2.Monasticism – because – it is the problem – the world is the hindrance to my spiritual growth. 3.Exclusivism – because that teaching is the hindrance to my spiritual growth. 4.Mysticim – because the Devil and his emissaries are the hindrance to my spiritual growth. 5.If the problem is my flesh then what is the solution? Consecration to the Spirit (8:1). The world and the Devil, find a friend in the flesh. All the time you are trying to battle the flesh is selling you out, double dealing behind your back with the enemy! I need to start here! Depending upon how you view the battle determines how you go about the fight! If I view the battle as primarily external what I need is another meeting! If I view the battle as primarily internal what I need is to put into practice the things I heard at the last meeting. If I view the battle as external; I may be heard to say: 'great preacher, great meeting.' If I view the battle as internal; I am more likely to say: 'challenging message.' If I view the battle as external; I will be looking for the perfect church! If I view the battle as internal; I will be looking for a closer walk with Christ! In chapter 7 we move from: Death and sin in chapter 6 - death frees us from sin to Death and law in 7:1-4 - death frees us from law 3 sections in chapter 7: 1.Death and Law - Freedom (7:1-4) 2.Law and Flesh - Failure (7:5-13) 3.Flesh and Will - Frustration (7:14-25) Death and Law - Freedom (7:1-4) i.The Rule of Law (v1) "The law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth" - the principle stated The rule or dominion of law extends only to death, as does sin (Rom5:12) In eternity there is no sin and can be no sin for there is no law either! On the surface, a point that is straight forward enough! But the apostle seems to chose a very complex parable as the means of conveying this truth. So complex that some would suggest that Paul has bitten off more than he can chew! That he has mad a bit of a mess of the illustration! In the chapter the believer is freed (7:4), just like the woman but it isn't the woman who dies it is her husband! But the parable illustrates something more than just the basic truth! So some have said the parable is a bit mixed up! A kind of mixed metaphor! Maybe Paul has overstretched himself! Others holding to the inspiration of the Word of God wouldn't maybe just go as far as saying that but would perhaps tacitly acknowledge it by saying, 'don't look too deeply into the parable,' or perhaps that the parable is only meant to illustrate the basic truth, perhaps indicating that underneath the surface the whole illustration is a bit of a mess! But this is the inspired Word of God and "not one jot or title shall pass away" "the Word of God is living and powerful..." Interestingly there are plenty of simple examples that Paul could have used to illustrate his point that the rule of law extends only to death and then law has no more demands upon us: a)Ahithophel - was he ever called to account for betraying the Lord's anointed? No he wasn't! Why? He hung himself! b)Naomi's two sons were they ever dealt with by the law and put out of the congregation of Israel for marrying Moabite girls? No! Why? They both died in Moab! c)Eli's two sons Hophni and Phinehas were they ever broad before the law for fornication? No! Why? They both died in battle! d)Samson and his fornication and adultery? But he doesn't chose a simple illustration, for as we shall see a simple example of this principle just would not have done, it would have been critically lacking in at least 2 perhaps 3 key areas. Pauls example illustrates at least 4 key principles: i.The Rule of law ii.The Release from Law iii.The Role of Relationship in the release from Law iv.The Result of Release from Law The Rule of Law (v1) "The law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth" - the principle states The rule or dominion of law extends only to death, as does sin (Rom5:12) The principle stated is simple enough The Release from Law (v2,4) Death releases me from the rule of law In the parable however the death is not my death, the death of the woman, but the death of another! Has Paul got mixed up? Actually this point is quite consistent with the context of Romans so far In chp 3+4 we came into blessing; the blessing of justification by faith, through death, the death of another! In chp 5 Divine Grace was poured out, through the death of another. In chp 6 our consecration to God was made possible because of our identification with Christ in His death – the death of another. Not only is it the case that death frees from the law but that death is significantly the death of another! Notice how that release by death occurs. Our simple illustrations would again be inadequate here. This is not release from the law in the same way that perhaps Hophni and Phinehas, Ahithophel, Naomis sons or Samson were released from the law. This is not the release of a guilty party because of the weakness of the law, unable to pursue the sinner beyond death. In our parable, significantly, it is the release of a guiltless individual who is now regarded as having fulfilled all legal obligations and death has now brought the claims of law to an end. This is the release of the righteous rather than the unrighteous! “For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.” (2Co 5:21) “Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.” (Rom 3:28) The Role of Relationship in the release from the law: My relationship with another who is dead to the law in certain exceptional circumstances can affect my status before the law too! The death of another to the law can release me! I think in the context of Roms 4 to 6 this is highly significant! The nature of that relationship is also very interesting: marriage relationship! Right the way through the NT scriptures the relationship between Christ and His church is consistently viewed as a marriage relationship: (Eph 5:24ff; Rev21). In verse 4 we are "dead to the law" but it is by the "body of Christ" - the death of another! Notice the logic of verse 4: “Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God” Notice that nothing less than the “body of Christ” is needed to break me free from the demands of the law! The theme of redemption in scripture: the person of Christ, the work of Calvary, the sacrifice of the lamb, the sufferings of Christ (Ps22; Ps69; Isa53) all of this mighty work and sacrifice impacts upon my life at this point! To release me from that which binds me that I might be free to “bring forth fruit unto God.” What is this fruit? “But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.” (Rom 6:22)

Holiness is no add on to Christianity Holiness is no after thought on Gods part to Christian experience Holiness is the very essence of Christian experience! Holiness is the impression of Calvary upon my being! The Result of Release from the Law: In this complex parable of death releasing us from the law we see illustrated a point that could not be illustrated by a simple example of the death of the accused releasing him from the rule of law: (a)Ahithophel - what happened next? - Nothing he's dead. (b)Naomis' two sons - what happened next, after they were released from the law? Nothing - they were dead! (c)Eli's two sons - what happened to them next after they had been released from the law? Nothing - they were dead. But in the parable of Romans 7 after the release from the law there is a 'what happened next...' The woman released from the law is ready to move on and be married to another (7:4) And in our case: "that we should bring forth fruit unto God" (7:4) So this death is not simply an end but a beginning! Only because of the complex nature of this illustration is this point possible! Some take 7:1-4 to indicate that divorce and remarriage effectively exclude people from assembly fellowship (7:3) That interpretation sheds more light on the thinking of those who teach it than it does on the teaching of scripture on divorce and remarriage! The teaching in this section relative to the woman marrying another is whilst she is "bound by the law." There is no provision in the law for operation of Divine Grace. Those who draw their teaching on divorce and remarriage from this section likewise draw no provision from Divine Grace. The conclusion of this section brings us to our true standing today of being "dead to the law" (7:4) and in our dealings with men and women we must likewise recognise that there is likewise "therefore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus." There is good indication elsewhere that people from a background of divorce and remarriage were received into assembly fellowship: 1 Tim2; 1 Co7, John 4. Salvation isn't the end it is the beginning! Once you are save, you haven't 'done it' but rather God has 'begun it.'

Taken from a message preached on: Romans Chp 6 Vs 12 to 20 : 'Because I Serve Another' by Dr J Stewart Gillespie “Shall we continue in sin?” (Rom6:1) We considered 4 reasons:

1.We are Dead to Sin (6:1-6) 2.We are Alive to Christ (6:5-11) 3.Because I Serve Another (6:12-20) 4.Because Sin remains Sin (6:21-23) Because I Serve Another: It is instructive by way of contrast to compare Romans 6 with Deuteronomy 6. In Deut 6 why shouldn't I sin? Why shouldn't I serve other gods: Deut 6:13ff – reason not to sin – because God will wipe you out if you do (Deut 6:15) That's a good reason mark you! The theme continues in Deut 7:4; 11:13-17. The reason not to sin was really very clear! The OT scriptures don't only present the rod mind you they do also present the staff – leading us into blessing The bulk of Romans 6: verses 12 to 20, though deals with a positive reason not to sin. How do we “reckon yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin” (6:11) Only by being: “alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord” (6:11) If I am 'dead unto God' none of this will work. Sin will no longer “reign in your mortal body” (6:12) as I yield that body over to the practical service of and devotion to Christ (6:12-20) Being “dead indeed unto sin” (v11) means not giving sin its way / freedom to use our body for its purpose / ends (v12), not to allow sin to use me for its purposes, to achieve its goals, but rather to take my body and give it over to Gods service (v13) The best protection against sin is the practice of sanctification! The best defence is attack Amongst the armour of God in Eph 6 are the feet shod with the preparation of the gospel – not only defence but attack and progress! The best protection against sin is the practice of sanctification! What do I mean by sanctification? I mean being actively, positively as well as negatively being set apart for the service of God! (1)There's a man who struggles with alcohol. What are you going to tell him to do? Go to the pub with his pals and drink lemonade instead or go to the prayer meeting and pray fro the Spirits power to overcome the flesh? You see the different approach? That is the practice of sanctification: leaving the sin behind – the negative and cleaving to Christ – the positive!

(2)There's a sister who struggles with her relationship with another sister. What do you advise her to do? Avoid the sister? The world would advise that! How about pray for her? Positive sanctification. You're just making these up Stewart! This is the Biblical approach: “Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.” (Rom 12:20-21)

(3)There's a believer with a growing awareness that he is wasting a lot of his time on the TV / internet / Bebo / twitter / face book – what do you advise him to do? Switch off the TV / internet – that will just leave a gap that he may fill with something even less profitable! What did the Spirit counsel Timothy to do? “Till I come, give attendance to reading, to exhortation, to doctrine. Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery. Meditate upon these things; give thyself wholly to them; that thy profiting may appear to all. Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.” (1Ti 4:13-16). This is the positive practice of sanctification. The best protection against sin is the practice of sanctification! How do I begin then to reckon myself dead indeed unto sin (v11)? This is a deliberate exercise of the will! I need to do it! A man, his master, his motive and his members! Consider how the whole body is used in service: 1.Our master (6:12) – Our Head 2.Our mortal body (6:12) – Our Human Desires / Lusts of the Body 3.Our members (6:13) – Our Hands 4.Our motive (6:17-19) – Our Heart 1.Our master (6:12) – Our Head Know your master We can say no! We don't have to obey sin! Sometimes we do things because we have always done it! You don't have to! Who is in charge? Who is my master? There are only 2 possibilities: i.Sin (5:21) ii.Christ (5:21; 6:10,11) Who is my head in this action? The head controls the body – what the head says the body obeys, even when we don't want to: seizure, spasms, jerks, migraine There are 2 great spiritual realities which are above us, we do not control them rather we choose between them – Christ or Sin! Being “free from sin” and “dead to sin” we are now able to choose where before we had no choice I no more control sin and Satan than I control Christ and righteousness. There are many such examples in scriptures of men who thought they could control their sin but their sin controlled them:

i.Noah and his wine – Lost his dignity ii.Lot's wife and a love for the world – Lost her home, family and life iii.Achan and materialism – Lost his life iv.Solomon and his wives – Lost his Kingdom v.Israel and her idols – Lost the Glory of God vi.Judas and his love of money – Lost his soul Who exactly was in control? We have a great advantage here, we are able to look back on these biblical characters and take in the whole scope and panorama of their life! Our freedom lies in our ability to choose not in our freedom from the consequences of those decisions we make! 2.Our mortal body (6:12) – Our Human Desires Know your mortal body What is driving the activities of my mortal body? The body itself was created by God and has God given desires that are good and right: i.Appetite for food ii.Thirst iii.Sexual desires iv.Appreciation of beauty v.Love of art So all of these things are good aren't they? So surely we can just follow our desires can't we? The human body and its desires are not on 'automatic pilot' we are not computers preprogrammed and set to run automatically! Our bodies are subject to our human nature and that nature is a fallen human nature corrupted by sin – referred to as the “flesh” The flesh constantly pulls me in the direction of gratifying the natural desires of the body, those desires are physical and earth bound and keep me tied to earth. Only with conversion and the power of Gods Spirit can I rise any higher that the desire to simply satisfy the natural desires of the body and only with His Spirit do I really appreciate that there is anything beyond the material to aim for and desire! Rom 8:5-13 The desire and goal of the believer goes beyond simply enjoying the stimulation of bodily appetites satisfied: Rom 6:19, 22 – we have fruit to bring for God – our goal is “holiness”! Is it the flesh driven by “lust” which is using: i.My hands for its deeds? ii.My eyes for its satisfaction? iii.My lips for its message? Are these desires lusts or: i.Sinful desires (1 John2:16) ii.Selfish desires (James 4:1-4) iii.Satanic desires (Jo 8:44) iv.Sanctified desires 3.“Our members” (6:13) – Our Hands Know your members Think about what you do and why you do it! We often correctly regard laziness and slothfulness as an attribute worthy of condemnation and so it is: i.2 Thess 3:6ff ii.1 Tim 5:13ff iii.Prov 6:6: “Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways, and be wise:” and because of that we then wrongly deduce that any business is a virtue! This section and other scriptures prompt us to look beyond mere activity. Not only what are we doing but what are we achieving? When I use my: i.Time ii.Treasure iii.Talents what am I actually achieving? Consider Mary and Martha (Lk10:38-42) Paradoxically when we apply the teaching of this section we may find that to be truly productive in the things of God we need to stop doing some things as we consider what they are actually achieving! I am a believer in that principle, of stopping service in a particular sphere as well as starting it! (Matt10:14; Mk6:11). “Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin... your members as instruments of righteousness unto God... whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?...as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity; even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness.” (Rom 6:13-19) We are looking at outcome not only occupation! Outcome in terms of “righteousness” - does it promote righteousness and “holiness” - does it further my pursuit of deeper holiness to God and encourage others in their pursuit of holiness, and “unto God” - is it acceptable to God? But you say I am busy! Busy but barren? Tests of worth / value: 1.What is the cause of my actions / activities (6:12-13). Is sin and the flesh the cause or is God the cause of this kind of action / activity / these words? If an ungodly person would do what I am about to do, say what I am about to say, go about tackling the problem the way I am about to tackle it, it is probably sin and the flesh that is the cause of my actions rather than the Spirit of God. 2.What is the character of my actions? Could I categorise it as “righteous” (v13) and consistent with Gods Word (v18) or is it “unrighteous”? 3.What are the consequences of this action (v19)? Where does it lead to? Is it “unto iniquity” (v19) or is it “unto holiness” (v19). This is a profound truth that certain actions / activities / conversations/ language / behaviour / interests can draw me towards God, ie. They promote “holiness” and certain actions / activities / conversations/ language / behaviour / interests can draw me away from God: “unto iniquity.” “Who shall ascend into the hill of the LORD? or who shall stand in his holy place?” (Psa 24:3) 4.What about the conclusion of these actions? Do they end in death and with death (v16,21) or do these actions have eternal and enduring consequences (v22)? There are some things I can engage in, in time that have consequences that endure for eternity: “And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.” (Luk 16:9) “But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal:”(Mat 6:20) “And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible.” (1Co 9:25) “For what is our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing? Are not even ye in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ at his coming?”(1Th 2:19) “Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing.”(2Ti 4:8) “Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.”(Jas 1:12) “And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away.”(1Pe 5:4) “Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.”(Rev 2:10) 4.Our motive (6:19) – Our Heart What is our purpose in this? Holiness (v19) What fruit have you? Is it fruit unto holiness? (v22) What fills my heart and drives me forward? The word is sown: “form of doctrine” Sown in the heart An army doesn't fight on an empty stomach To fight I need food The food for the fight is “that form of doctrine” Faulty doctrine results in faulty behaviour Satan attacks the doctrine and disables the believer

1 Samuel Chp 30 David finds an Egyptian in the field A strange incident – the Egyptian appears and then disappears from the pages of scripture What is it all about? There are too many pictures, patterns and prophecies of Christ links with David for it not to mean something! David is full pictures of Christ: i.1 Samuel 16: David “anointed” : “mâshîyach” from the Hebrew word Messiah ii.1 Samuel 16: David, now the anointed one, heads out to the valley of Elah: the valley of the oak tree iii.1 Samuel 16: David heads out to the valley of Elah with bread in one hand and wine in the other! iv.1 Samuel 16: oh yes and transport has been provided as he heads out to the valley of the oak tree: an ass (16:20) v.1 Samuel 17: at the valley of the oak tree David will meet Goliath of Gath, a giant of a monster, marked by 666 – 6 items of armour, the spears head weighing 600 shekels, his height 6 cubits and a span vi.1 Samuel 17: at the valley of the oak tree David will slay Goliath with his own sword (Heb 2:14). vii.1 Samuel 18: The victory in the valley of Elah brings him a bride: Michal viii.1 Samuel 19 - 31: Such a victory ought to bring David the throne but instead he now knows rejection ix.1 Samuel 19: David in rejection ascends to Naioth : 'the residence' in Ramah 'high place' x.1 Samuel 19: David having ascended to Naioth : 'the residence' in Ramah 'high place' there is a descent of the Holy Spirit and a pouring out of the Spirit of prophecy in 3 distinct waves xi.1 Samuel 25: David will call his bride by missionary endeavour announcing a 3 fold “peace” to those who are afar off by sending his representatives to Nabal (25:6) xii.1 Samuel 25: those like Abigail who have a heart for and an appreciation of David will respond with repentance (25:28) xiii.1 Samuel 25: Abigail exhorts the person, power, privilege and purpose of David in terms reminiscent of Psalm 110 (25:28) xiv.1 Samuel 30 – having called his bride in chp 25, David will now come for and claim his bride in chp 30. xv.2 Samuel 5 – David will be crowned with his bride and will reign over all of Israel after a gap of 7 years – difficult years of tribulation for Israel. It is hard in view of all these pictures and pointers to Christ to lack the desire to ask why and what is the purpose of this Egyptian in the field? This Egyptian, a man of the world , is found in a “field” in 1 Sam 30. The “field” sometimes occurs in the language of parables as a picture of the world (Matt 13) Consider the Egyptian and: 1.His master (6:12) 2.His mortal body (6:12) 3.His members (6:13) 4.His motive (6:19) The Egyptian is brought to David (30:11,12) David will: 1.Refresh his thirst with water to drink cf. John 4. 2.Feed his hunger with bread to eat cf. John 6. 3.Bring fruit; figs and raisins cf. John 15. This Egyptian has been left for dead by the Amalekites like the man left by the side of the road in the parable of the good Samaritan in Luke chp 10. This man has known death to the flesh and sin. There has been a gap of 3 days and 3 nights The phrase 3 days and 3 nights only occurs on 3 occasion in scripture: 1.Jonah 1:17 2.Matt 12:40 3.1 Sam 30:12 On the other 2 occasions it is linked with resurrection and specifically the resurrection of Christ, of which Jonah is a picture. This Egyptians death and burial and resurrection is then followed by Life at the hands of David, sustained by: 1.water to drink cf. John 4. 2.bread to eat cf. John 6. 3.fruit; figs and raisins cf. John 15. Do you think Amalek would ever have had a clue as to how David found them? I doubt it – for as far as Amalek were concerned that Egyptian was dead. This man had been left behind sick (30:13) and with no food and water (30:12) – he had been left to die! Is this not how the world still leaves us? This Egyptian was once a “servant” of the Amalekites (30:13): i.“we made an invasion” (30:14) ii.“we burned Ziklag” (30:14) Now that he is restored to life and brought back by david will he return to serve Amalek? This man sees a change of status from serving Amalek to serving David. Not only will he serve David but he will destroy Amalek (30:15-17) I don't continue in sin because: I am happy not to sin. https://graceinchrist.org/romans

Taken from a message preached by Dr J Stewart Gillespie:

'The Body of Sin' (Romans Chapter 6 verse 6)

In response to the question of Roms 6:1 “shall we continue in sin?” we saw 4 reasons why we should not continue in sin:

1.We are dead to sin
2.We are alive to God
3.We no longer serve sin – we serve God
4.Sin remains sin

1.because I'm dead to Sin (6:1-7)

What does it mean to be “dead to sin”?
Does it mean to be unresponsive to sin?

Dead people are unresponsive, aren't they?
In this case then the bulk of Roms 6 would be redundant – the middle section (6:12-20) and 3rd reason for not sinning (cf. Vs 11-13).
If we were “dead to sin” in the sense of being unresponsive to sin there would be no possibility of : “yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin” (v13) and we would hardly require to “reckon” ourselves “dead indeed unto sin” for we would be “dead indeed” (6:11) unto sin!
Be careful what you use to interpret the scriptures!
Personal experience, common sense or even a reliable medical text book is not appropriate!
We only have Divine warrant for using scripture to interpret scripture (1Co2:13; 2 Tim2:15; Rom15:4; 2Peter1:19) guided by the Spirit of God (John 16:13; 1Jo2:27)
This death is positional 'in Christ' (Rom6:3, 5, 6, 8)
What is the significance of being “dead to sin”?
Death is the boundary line for the rule of 'king sin' (5:21)
I have been taken out of the realm / rule / reign of sin by the death of Christ
I am no longer under the absolute authority of King Sin
Every Kingdom has a boundary and the boundary of sin is death (Rom5:21)
By virtue of my position in Christ I am “dead to sin”

Man in creation was able to sin
Man after the fall was unable not to sin
Man in redemption is able not to sin
Man in eternity is unable to sin

I don't continue in sin because:
1 - I don't have to sin
2 - because I'm alive to God (6:8-11)

We saw that we were definitely dead in Roms 6:

(a)v2 - “dead”
(b)v3 - “baptised” + “dead”
(c)v4 - “buried” + “baptised” + “dead”

We are definitely dead!
This seemed a rather strange thought until we realised that in fact it was a very familiar truth but viewed from an unusual perspective – from the back!
We noticed a transition in v5: “planted” - that's burial with a future!
To be dead to sin is the other side of being alive to God!
We though that we ought to stretch ourselves a little and try to understand what this meant practically!
Keeping my feet firmly planted on earth what does this actually mean?
We looked at 2 Kings 4 and the son of the Shunammite

I see through His eyes:

This gives the believer a different perspective on others!
Isn't it amazing how callous the unsaved can be about others?
Referring to some as useless, as the dregs of society, as a waste of space and finding individuals to look down their nose at.
We look at others not through the eyes of the critic but through the eyes of Christ!
This would revolutionise fellowship in the local assembly.

I speak with His lips

I work with His hands:

Some things I just do not see, I cannot imagine the hands of Christ turning to:

Dealing drugs
Rolling a joint
Holding a can of beer
Punching someone's lights out
Filling in a lottery form
Flicking through a pornographic magazine

Then we turned to Colossians chp 3 and we saw that it wasn't just vivid imagination on my part that saw in the hands, eyes and mouth of the resurrected lad of 2 Kings 4 a picture of our dependence upon Christ as the source of life for our new life but rather these are the very features of a NT believer whose life is given over to Christ!
I don't continue in sin because:
I don't like to sin.

These 4 reasons for not continuing in sin are not an unconnected 'list' but rather they follow on from one another in a logical spiritual order.
We have seen already the connection between the 1st 2 reasons – they are really just opposite sides of the same reason!
Between the first 2 reasons and the last reasons there is a crossroads: 6:6.
An important verse and perhaps the most difficult verse in the chapter.
If we fail to understand this verse:

i.we will miss the connection between these reasons
ii.we will fail to see the chapter as one integral whole and probably only see a load of disjointed thoughts
iii.we will most likely fail to understand the reason why we ought not to serve sin any longer
iv.we will miss the main reason in Roms 6 behind our sanctification ie. The reason 'WHY' we ought not to sin.
v.we will probably thus find that our own personal holiness will suffer – if we lack a reason for holiness we will lack motivation to holiness!



Romans 6:6 presents a complete view of holiness:

1.Past: “our old man was crucified”
2.Present: “that henceforth we should not serve sin”
3.Future: “that the body of sin might be destroyed”

Notice in this list I have given these tenses in their chronological order, according to time but this is different from the order in the verse!
Herein lies to key to understanding the verse!
Paul gives us 2 great events – past and future, consider what has happened in the past “our old man was crucified” and consider what will happen in the future: “that the body of sin might be destroyed” and now live your life in the light of that!
The believer lives out his life between what has been completed and what will be completed and ought to make intelligent decisions in the light of these 2 great events!

1.“the old man” - What we were before we were saved, our old life as ruled by the flesh drawing us to constantly live a life taken up with satisfying the apetites of the body, lusts of the flesh and the cares of this world (Eph 4:22; Col3:9)

2.“that the body of sin might be destroyed” - is this:

(a)Sin Personified – Sin viewed as a person dieing on the cross? - John Calvin and Hodge, JN Darby all had this view of the verse – that in this verse I am looking back at Calvary, I see Christ hanging on the cross, I see Him dieing for my sins (Col 2:14) and I see their my sins hanging with Him, judged at Calvary.

Sin was certainly judged at Calvary but we notice:

i.That in vs 1-5 and again in vs 7,8 it is not sin that dies but me!

ii.If sin died or was crucified at Calvary would this be a reason for not allowing it to “reign in your mortal body” (v12) or to no longer “serve sin” (6:6)? Surely if sin was crucified at Calvary there is no longer any sin to serve for it is dead! I would expect the argument in the rest of the section to be: 'don't serve sin because sin is dead' but actually the argument is that I ought not to serve sin because I am dead!

iii.The means of destroying the body of sin was by crucifying “the old man” - would crucifying my old pre-christian life really bring about the death of sin itself? People die of cancer every day but that doesn't bring an end to cancer itself!

(b)Sin Neutralised - The Power of Sin over the Body? - Promoted by Albert Leckie and James Currie.

i.This interpretation immediately runs into a problem with the word “destroyed” because if this interpretation is correct the power of sin has been “destroyed” over the body, this is practically untrue! So these interpretors tend to change the translation of the verse to “anulled” - a valid translation elsewhere of this word when used in a legal sense elsewhere in Romans (Rom 3:3; 3:31; 4:14; 7:2) but perhaps not in a very similar contexts in 1 Corinthians (1 Co6:13). Even if we do translate the word as annulled we still have a problem as to what we mean by annulled. Here the commentators become a bit unstuck: 'Because the old man has been, in the reckoning of God judicially put to death as the result of the death of Christ, sin's power has 'been made of none effect' in relation to the believer. Henceforth he need not, he should not, serve sin...' (James B Currie p101) – actually if Mr Curries interpretation is correct it is hardly a case of 'need not' or 'should not' serve sin it would be really a case of 'cannot' serve sin!

ii.This interpretation seems to take inadequate account of the word “body” - the object of the destruction is not “sin” but the “body of sin”

iii.As already mentioned it is not “sin” that dies in any of the surrounding verses but rather self (6:2-5, 7-8,11).

iv.What is the effect of Calvary on my present human body? This interpretation suggests that Calvary liberates the body and frees it from sin. If this is the case how do we explain Rom 8:10 which seems to suggest that Calvary instead of liberating the convict puts him on death row! There is sin back again, the same sin that supposedly was 'anulled' at Calvary and it has killed the body!


(c)Sin Externalised- The Body as the instrument of sin

i.“body” has its usual meaning – the human body!

ii.At Calvary and by the work of Christ, sin was dealt with, a completed work completely saves (Heb10:14)

iii.In our experience we already see the fruit and consequences of that work, for from conversion we are the recipients of:

(1)A new heart (Ezek 36:26; Heb8:10)
(2)A new spirit (Ezek 36:26; John 3:5)
(3)A new mind (Heb8:10; Rom 12:2)
(4)A new creature (2 Co 5:17)
(5)There remains only one part of my being which has not been renewed by Calvary – my body! All that is left untouched from Adam. This too must one day be changed! A body once used to serve sin will be replaced by one fitted to serve Christ (1Co15:42-50). This new body comes as a consequence of Christ's resurrection, the subject of the previous verse (5:11).
iv.The effect of Adam is seen in tracing sin through Romans. From Rom1:1 to 5:11 there are 9 refs to sin, from 5:12-21 there are 9 refs to sin, in chp 6 there are 17 ref to sin and in chp 7, 15 ref to sin. With the introduction of Adam in 5:12 there is in Romans an explosion of sin!
v.The “body of sin” thus refers to my literal body, used to pursue the desires of the flesh and corrupted by sin. Calvary first condemns this body as it does condemn the whole of the person corrupted by sin: body, heart, mind, soul and spirit (Rom8:10), before the saving work of Calvary then renews the person, one day to complete that renewal with a new body (1Co15:42-50).
vi.Therefore I am currently a 'new creature' in a condemned house. A regenerate person in a degenerate body. This leaves me with a question: how should I live? As though the house was not condemned, pretending that there is life in the old man yet? Pretending that all of those activities I once indulged in with my body actually and finally achieve anything? Or do I live not for the old body now dead because of sin but rather I live for the new self who does have a future, unlike the old body? It is this that forms the crossroads between the 1st 2 and the last 2 reasons of Romans 6 for not continuing in sin.

Click Here to Listen to this message on MP3

These notes are from a message preached at Bridgend Gospel Hall, New Cumnock by Dr J Stewart Gillespie.

Click here to listen to the message in MP3

“shall we continue in sin that grace may abound?” (6:1)

This verse might seem to present a bizarre idea, a strange suggestion At times grace shields from our horizon the full consequences of our sin God remains a Holy and Righteous God – He has not changed It is possible however for this kind of idea to creep into our thinking Am I trading on Gods Grace? Would my behaviour change if: i.If I thought that my lie / deception would be dealt with the same way as Ananias Saphira's was? (Acts 5) 2 believers lie to the Holy Spirit, maybe a little ½ lie – they sold the land and gave 'most' of it for the work of the Lord and said that they had given 'all' of it. Just a slight exaggeration? Did it really matter? Ananias executed on the spot by the Spirit of God and his wife executed 3 hours later! God has not changed! ii.If I thought that my greed / materialism would be dealt with in the same way as Achan's was – Joshua chp 7. Jericho has just fallen, and explicit instructions have been given by God that the city and all in it are cursed, nothing to be taken for any private use. The gold, silver, brass and iron can be used for the sanctuary but everything else is to be left. Achan – just one man amongst millions who obey, takes 3 items: “...a goodly Babylonish garment, and two hundred shekels of silver, and a wedge of gold of fifty shekels weight...” (Jos 7:21). Whats the big deal? A few items which were going to be wasted anyway? The righteousness of God was the BIG deal. “...a goodly Babylonish garment” - “a trendy outfit from the high street.” Because of this disobedience of one man the entire army of Israel is defeated at Ai and Achan and his sons and daughters and animals are stoned and burned! iii.If I thought that my grumbling would be dealt with the same way as Miriam's was (Num 12). Miriam and others had an issue with Moses leadership and wanted to push him out and move in (Num12:2). They take a round about approach to manoeuvring Moses out and attack him from the side – his wife (12:1) – not really the issue! Be careful how we approach a ministry that challenges us! iv.If I thought that discord with my brethren would be made as public as that of Euodias and Syntyche's was (Phil 4) – Paul wrote of it in a letter, sent it to the church, copied it around the world and published it for 2000 years! Way to go! If every email I wrote were copied to every recipient in outlook express, if every text message was copied to every number in my phone book, if every telephone conversation were recorded and made public, would I say / write or text the things I do? If it would change my behaviour to anticipate my sin being dealt with in these ways then I am trading on Divine Grace! I am banking on Gods Grace to allow me to continue in sin! 4 reasons why we don't continue in sin: 1.because I'm dead to Sin (6:1-8) 2.because I'm alive to God (6:8-11) 3.because I must serve God (6:11-21) 4.because sin remains sin (6:21-23) Dead to Sin This may seem a strange idea, awkward thought, after all I am alive, am I not? Positional truth – true because of my position in Christ, not because I hold the Bible at a strange angle! Positional truth is not the opposite of real truth either (as was once suggested by a preacher at a conference)! Positional truth is very real but not always fully realised! Positional truth is true of me because it is true of Christ and I am in Christ, I have a relationship with Him! Compare the benefits which the people of God had in the days of Samuel and David: they were in the land, with an inheritance, towns and homes to dwell in, but had they fought for them? Their forefathers had won them in the days of Joshua and because of their relationship with their forefathers what had previously been fought and won by another was now theirs! This is no new idea for us in Romans, should already be familiar with it, cf. Roms chp 3 +4 – justification by faith. I have been declared righteous! Am I righteous? God has said you are! How can I be righteous? Because of my position in Christ (3:26) Dead to sin doesn't mean unresponsive to sin (6:12-13) I have moved out of the realm / sphere of sin I have left the boundary within which king sin reigns (5:21) Sin reigns to death and no further! There is no sinning in heaven and there is no sinning in hell either! i.Adam as created was able to sin ii.After the fall man was unable not to sin iii.After the new birth man is able not to sin iv.In eternity man is unable to sin Does this idea of death to sin seem a strange truth? That Christianity begins with an end. This is the truth emphasised in the opening 8 verses of Romans chapter 6: i.death (v2) ii.baptism + death (v3) iii.burial + baptism + death (v4) iv.planted (v5) Does it all seem a bit odd – a bit strange? Actually its very familiar. It is a very familiar truth but viewed from an unusual angle – from the back This is familiar truth The truth of being dead to sin is the other side of being alive in Christ and alive to God! This is one truth, connected together for example in v5 “planted” - the seed sown in the autumn, dead and lifeless and unexciting shoots up in the spring. Burial and growth are 2 sides of the one truth! Planting is death with a prospect! Alive in Christ / Alive to God: 3 tremendous aspects: 1.Present Experience (v4) 2.Future Expectation (v5) 3.Eternal Enjoyment (v8) We notice the pattern that future hope is founded on present help This was the pattern noted previously in Rom 5:1-5 Future expectation was founded on present experience The same is true of life in Christ: future expectation is founded in present experience This is no subtlety of exposition This is no fine point of interpretation This is no needless digression This is why, as believers we have at times such a hard time! “For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For in this we groan, earnestly desiring to be clothed upon with our house which is from heaven:” (2Co 5:1-2) “For which cause we faint not; but though our outward man perish, yet the inward man is renewed day by day.” (2Co 4:16) It's not a pleasant thing to perish! The 2 truths go hand in hand: death to the old life and new life in Christ Our strength is taken that we might rest in His (Jer 9:23) The day will soon come when time and sense and wealth and strength have been long gone and all that abides is Him! In that day we will be grateful for all that the Lord stripped from us of earth prematurely that we might be drawn more closer to Him! What does it mean to be: “Alive to God” (6:10,12) “Alive through Jesus Christ” (6:11) 2 Kings 4: The chapter concerns a child of promise (4:16), just like Isaac (Gen18) and just like us (Gal4:28) This child of promise experiences a death, whilst busy in the field (4:18) and whilst reaping for his father Consider the chapter practically: what do we do when we hit a period of barrenness in our service for Christ? 1.Recycle: The approach of preachers gone stale. Some hark back to a day when things were fresher, when Christ was closer and draw from better and brighter days! I used to wonder what motivated so many dispensational preachers to affirm with such confidence that this was “the day of small things” (Zech4:10), until I realised that there were really speaking personally of their own spiritual experience. They could look back on better days when Christ was real and fresh to them! 2.Resign:

There was a day when faith was bright, Before the sun had reached its height (v20) But now beneath a darkening evening sky, With head so heavy and about to die (v19) I drop the scythe, the field I leave behind (v18) For from my Father's service I resign A better comfort I have found upon my bed (v21) Alas this is the place but for the dead!

3.Raised again / restored: Refreshed with the life of Christ again The Shunammite comes to Carmel (fruitfulness) She heads to Elisha, personally, only he will do, not his servant and not his staff, only Elisha personally. She would make it a priority to lay hold of Elisha (4:27,30)! The one who was the source of life would be the sustainer of life She would follow the pattern and path of Job and Jacob: “Though he slay me, yet will I trust in him: but I will maintain mine own ways before him.” (Job 13:15) “And he said, Let me go, for the day breaketh. And he said, I will not let thee go, except thou bless me.” (Gen 32:26) A priority to pursue and lay hold of Him! Determination is needed to lay hold of Divine blessing (4:27,30) Restoration and revival (4:34) i.mouth to mouth ii.eyes to eyes iii.hands to hands The new life in Christ: i.mouth to mouth (Col 3:8) ii.eyes to eyes (Col 3:12-14) iii.hands to hands (Col3:9) Practically what is the new life in Christ? It is to: i.see with His eyes ii.speak with His lips iii.work with His hands Then I am living the life of Christ This is not works righteousness by the back door! This can only be achieved in the power of His Spirit! i.see with His eyes: Looking at one another not through the eyes of a critic but rather through the eyes of Christ (Col 3:12-14)! ii.speak with His lips (Col 3:8-9) iii.work with His hands (Col 3:9) When man sinned and left the service of God in the garden of Eden these 3 aspects of mans being were were consecrated to sin (Gen3:6): i.“woman saw” / “pleasant to eyes” - eyes ii.“she took” - hands iii.“did eat” - mouth The same pattern re-echoes in 1 Sam 14:27 in Jonathan as he partakes of the forbidden honey, hands eyes and mouth going in the wrong direction. In the fall Satan captured man's life with his: i.Action – hand ii.Appetite – month iii.Attention – eye In salvation Christ restores man's life with its: i.Action – hand ii.Appetite – mouth iii.Attention - eye One part of the anatomy I noted was missing in 2 Kings 4 – what about the feet? Why no mention of the feet? Very important part of the body for service – the walk! How do you take a dog a walk? Tie a rope around its feet and drag it? A collar and a lead – if you control the head the rest of the body follows on after! If he has my hands, my eyes and my mouth the rest will follow on after! I will live out the life of Christ! These notes are from a message preached at Bridgend Gospel Hall, New Cumnock by Dr J Stewart Gillespie. https://graceinchrist.org/romans