Wednesday 6 January 2010

Romans Chapter 7 verses 5 to 13 : Covetousness and Carnality

Posted in by JS Gillespie |
Notes from a message preached by Dr J Stewart Gillespie At Bridgend Gospel Hall New Cumnock To listen to the MP3 recording of this message click here Chapter 6: 4 reasons we do not continue in sin: 1.Dead to sin 2.Alive to Christ 3.Serve another 4.Sin remains sin The bulk / the biggest of these 4 reasons presented in chapter 6 was: 'I serve another' which runs from about verse 12 to 20. Chapter 7 continues where chapter 6 left off Chapter 7 looks at what stops me from living the life I ought to live, a life that really counts for God and for eternity, The believer has 3 great enemies: 1.The World 2.The Flesh 3.The Devil cf. James 3:15; Psalm 17:12-14 Consider Moses and his rod used against Egypt – the world, the serpent – the Devil and Amalek – the flesh Consider David in 1 Samuel 17 – up against Goliath marked by 666, Saul and his carnal advice and the world in the form of the Philistine army Come to Romans 7 you would hardly know we had 3 enemies, only 1 mentioned – the flesh! Why the is it that the flesh comes in for such special attention here? 1.The Devil – smarter enemy: the 'angel of light', whispering in your ear: 'this is the way...let me show you a better way...don't listen to the preacher...never mind your bible..you needn't get rid of that sin, just cut it down a bit and if you can't cut it down a bit, just pretend you have, no one needs know...you can handle it.' 2.The World – would be a bigger enemy 3.The Flesh – the weakest enemy! Paradoxically the most significant! It is the weakest link in the chain! The flesh is the most vulnerable! The flesh becomes the final common pathway of all attack on my spiritual progress! So then if I didn't have the flesh: 1.Satan would be unable to gain a foothold in my life? Correct! Consider the words of Christ: “The prince of this world cometh and hath nothing in me” (John 14:30) 2.The world would have no appeal to me? Correct! Consider 1 John 2:16: “all that is in the world the lust of the flesh...” 3.Sin would have no appeal to me? Correct! (Rom7:5) When we use our bodies / lifes to act / speak / serve, think of: 1.The Cause of the action: Is it “in the flesh,” is it the kind of thing an unsaved person would do? Is it just fulfilling natural desires? 2.The Consequences of that actions: God desires that all actions and service for Him lead me deeper into “holiness” (6:19,22) 3.The Conclusion (6:23) – does it lead to death? Do the results continue with positive significance after death, “unto eternal life”? It is through the flesh Satan will attack me! An unsaved person is very much in: 1.The Power of Sin (Rom 6) 2.The Power of Satan (Eph2) 3.The Power of the Flesh (Rom7:5) Yet a man will rarely commit a sin that he does not enjoy! So Satan will act on the flesh, the natural appetites, for a buzz, a good time, a thrill. The world will appeal to: materialism, sexual appetite, natural desires: “the lust of the flesh, lust of the eyes, the pride of life.” Beware of blaming your sin on the Devil! God doesn't! God holds me responsible for my own sin! A man generally will enjoy his own sin: David – acted and fell on sexual desire Samson – sexual desire was his downfall Nabal – gluttony Judas – love of money, Satan entered into him and yet Judas fell because of his own greed and materialism. He had kept the bag and stolen from it and now he sells the Lord for 30 pieces of silver! A sin Satanically designed to appeal to Judas' flesh! 7:1-4 – Freedom from Law 7:5-13 – Failure of Flesh 7:14-25 – Frustration with Flesh How does the flesh hold me back? 7:5 – The Flesh Rebels against God 7:6 – The Flesh Restricts God 7:7 – The Flesh Replaces God The Flesh Rebels Against God (7:5) What is the response of the flesh to God? To His Word? To His Law? This verse is here that I might be able to discern the action and reaction of my own flesh to Gods Word. Does the flesh respond to Gods Word by: (a)The flesh gets information from the law? The flesh sitting back, minding its own business, is informed about sin by the law, and finds itself drawn to do what it never thought to do before? I don't think that is it at all. There is something far more active in the relationship between the 2 in verse 5: “the passions of sins” (v5), this is the flesh pursuing sin with a passion! Consider how the 'flesh' responds to Gods Law / Gods Word: i.Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen19) – the men rebelled against Gods Word from Lot: 'who do you think you are?' Who are you telling what to do?' The flesh responds with rebellion against God and His Word. ii.Synagogue of Nazareth (Luke 4) – The Word of God preached, an opportunity to respond to the gospel, if you don't respond then I'll turn to the Gentiles! Remember Elijah and the widow of Zarephath, remember Elisha and the Shunammite! What was their response? We never thought of that before? We'll need to go home and discuss this with our Rabbis? No the response of the flesh was that of rejection – took Him to the brow of the hill to cast Him off. iii.Calvary – man responds in the flesh with revulsion: “hated without a cause” He was “despised and rejected of men...” they cried “crucify Him” (b)The flesh is not simply informed by the law rather it is surely clear the response of the flesh is that on inflammation! Why does this happen? Every person has: 1.The flesh – which rejects God (Rom 8:7) – Detests God 2.A Conscience (Rom 2) – which detects God As soon as the conscience detects God; in moral values eg Sodom and Gomorrah, in His Word eg Luke 4 or in Person – the rejection of Christ. I need the power of the Holy Spirit to overcome all of that! Beware of a response to the Word of God that: rebels, rejects, revolts – that is the response of the flesh. The Flesh Restricts God (7:6) The flesh wants to turn the reality of relationship into the routine of religion We have seen previously that service for God can become a dry, dismal, dead, formal thing, that comes out of: Responsibility Obligation Duty This is not the motive for true Christian service Psalm 40:8 “I delight to do thy will O my God, yea thy law is within my heart” D – Desire E – Enjoyment L – Love I – Intensity G – Glory of God H – Heart T – Total Commitment To serve the way God wants me to serve I need: 1.Passion to Serve (7:1-4) 2.Possibility / Ability to Serve (7:5-13) 3.Power to serve (7:14-25) The flesh desires to change that service into a cold legality / formality (7:6) It is possible to draw a certain comfort / consolation from the repetition of form. The flesh likes formality – it keeps God at a distance. Indicators of formality: we become caught up with: 1.The Processes of religion: “I hate, I despise your feast days, and I will not smell in your solemn assemblies.” (Amos 5:21) 2.The Places of religion: “But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple.” (Mat 12:6); Matt 24:1: the church / the hall! 3.The People of religion: “Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.” (Luke 3:8) cf. “Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.” (1Co 1:12) “For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?” (1Co 3:4) The Flesh Replaces God (7:7) Of all the commandments to pick in this verse why pick: “thou shalt not covet” ? Why that one? Are there not more important commandments? More serious laws? What about the 1st table of the law? Sins against God? Did you notice that “thou shalt not covet” is by way of illustration of “lust” (v7) – in other words it is covetousness that makes lust sinful. The problem with lust is, it is a form of covetousness. Lust – the product of the flesh, sets my heart on what it ought not to be set upon. Lust is sinful because it takes my heart away from where it ought to be. Consider how covetousness lies at the root of so many sins: 1.The root sin of the flesh – covetousness 2.The root sin of Satan – covetousness: Isa 14:12-13; Ezek 28:16 3.The root sin of the world – covetousness: 1 John 2:16 4.Idolatry is covetousness (col 3:5) 5.Theft is the practice of covetousness 6.Adultery is sexual covetousness Covetousness is therefore presented in scripture as: 1.The root of all evil (1 Tim6:10) 2.The impediment to entering into heaven (Matt 19:24) 3.The alternative to Holy Spirit filled living (Col 3:2) 4.The seminal / root sin behind Satan, the World and the Flesh. 5.Responsible for bringing Gods judgement upon His people (Isa 57:17) 6.The sin of displacing God from my heart and putting something or someone else in His place: Ps 119:36; Ezek 33:31; Heb 13:5. Covetousness is thus the Seminal sin: The Divine definition of sin expounded in the 10 commandments, exemplified throughout Israels history, exposed in times of Divine judgement upon His people and explained in scripture hinges upon Gods abhorrence to and utter intolerance of covetousness, that is the revulsion of God towards a created being becoming distracted by or occupied with anything other than God. This is a most dangerous sin committed when it is committed against the One who describes Himself as a “jealous God.” When I apply this to my life, the insight which it brings is little short of mind blowing: i.Every unnecessary shopping trip ii.Every distracted hour iii.Every wasted evening on the TV / internet iv.Every pre-occupation with material gain v.Every social event which takes priority over the spiritual Becomes an act of exceptional sinfulness. https://graceinchrist.org/romans

Romans Chapter 7 verses1 to 4 – A Passion for Service

Posted in by JS Gillespie |
Taken from a message preached at Bridgend Gospel Hall New Cumnock by Dr J Stewart Gillespie To listen to the MP3 recording click here “Shall we continue in sin?” (Rom6:1) We considered 4 reasons we don't continue in sin: 1.We are Dead to Sin (6:1-6) 2.We are Alive to Christ (6:5-11) 3.Because I Serve Another (6:12-20) 4.Because Sin remains Sin (6:21-23) Because I Serve Another: We thought about this practically Consider how the whole body is used in service, start from the top: 1.Our master (6:12) – Our Head 2.Our mortal body (6:12) – Our Human Desires / Lusts of the Body 3.Our members (6:13) – Our Hands 4.Our motive (6:17-19) – Our Heart 1.Our master (6:12) – Our Head Who is in charge? Who is my master? We chose our master! There are only 2 possibilities: i.Sin (5:21) ii.Christ (5:21; 6:10,11) Who is my head in this action? I no more control sin and Satan than I control Christ and righteousness. Some thought they could control sin: i.Noah and his wine – Lost his dignity ii.Lot's wife and a love for the world – Lost her home, family and life iii.Achan and materialism – Lost his life iv.Solomon and his wives – Lost his Kingdom v.Samson and his fornication – Lost his life vi.Judas and his love of money – Lost his soul Who exactly was in control? We have a great advantage here, we are able to look back on these biblical characters and take in the whole scope and panorama of their life! Our freedom lies in our ability to choose not in our freedom from the consequences of those decisions we make! 2.Our mortal body (6:12) – Our Human Desires Know your mortal body What is driving the activities of my mortal body? The body itself was created by God and has God given desires that are good and right: i.Appetite for food ii.Thirst iii.Sexual desires iv.Appreciation of beauty v.Love of art Our bodies are subject to our human nature and that nature is a fallen human nature corrupted by sin – referred to as the “flesh” The flesh constantly pulls me in the direction of gratifying the natural desires of the body, those desires are physical and earth bound and keep me tied to earth. Only with conversion and the power of Gods Spirit can I rise any higher that the desire to simply satisfy the natural desires of the body and only with His Spirit do I really appreciate that there is anything beyond the material to aim for and desire! Rom 8:5-13 The desire and goal of the believer goes beyond simply enjoying the stimulation of bodily appetites satisfied: Rom 6:19, 22 – we have fruit to bring for God – our goal is “holiness”! Is it the flesh driven by “lust” which is using: i.My hands for its deeds? ii.My eyes for its satisfaction? iii.My lips for its message? 3.“Our members” (6:13) – Our Hands Know your members The emphasis here is on outcome, not simply actvity! what am I actually achieving? Consider Mary and Martha (Lk10:38-42) Paradoxically when we apply the teaching of this section we may find that to be truly productive in the things of God we need to stop doing some things as we consider what they are actually achieving! I am a believer in that principle, of stopping service in a particular sphere as well as starting it! (Matt10:14; Mk6:11). “Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin... your members as instruments of righteousness unto God... whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?...as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity; even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness.” (Rom 6:13-19) We are looking at outcome not only occupation! Outcome in terms of “righteousness” - does it promote righteousness and “holiness” - does it further my pursuit of deeper holiness to God and encourage others in their pursuit of holiness, and “unto God” - is it acceptable to God? But you say I am busy! Busy but barren? Tests of worth / value: 1.What is the cause of my actions / activities (6:12-13). Is sin and the flesh the cause or is God the cause of this kind of action / activity / these words? 2.What is the character of my actions? Could I categorise it as “righteous” (v13) and consistent with Gods Word (v18) or is it “unrighteous”? 3.What are the consequences of this action (v19)? Where does it lead to? Is it “unto iniquity” (v19) or is it “unto holiness” (v19). 4.What about the conclusion of these actions? Do they end in death and with death (v16,21) or do these actions have eternal and enduring consequences (v22)? 4.Our motive (6:19) – Our Heart Surely not more about service? Surely this all isn't yet another message about doing more for God? I recall as a young believer developing a reaction of 'not another message about what we are meant to be doing for God' It is all very well speaking about service, exhorting to serve, talking about: 1.Responsibility 2.Obligation 3.Duty To serve but this can leave us cold and uninspired! Some of the people to whom Paul was writing had known most of their life about: 1.Responsibility 2.Obligation 3.Duty as a motive for service, but this failed to achieve the desired result in their life and in the life of the apostle. They knew “the law” (7:1), they knew all about their responsibility, obligation and duty under the law to serve God, but this is not the kind of service that Paul is speaking about in chp 6 to 8 of Romans. 1.Responsibility 2.Obligation 3.Duty Simply spell ROD – and this becomes a rod for our back. True service for God, true Christian service for God is not motivated, is not dynamised by have to. For true service I must move from: 1.Responsibility 2.Obligation 3.Duty To the dynamic of true Christian service. Consider the motivating principle behind the service of Christ for God: “Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire; mine ears hast thou opened: burnt offering and sin offering hast thou not required. Then said I, Lo, I come: in the volume of the book it is written of me, I delight to do thy will, O my God: yea, thy law is within my heart.” (Psa 40:6-8) His service was motivated by 'delight' and not by 'duty'! from: Desire Enjoyment Love Intensity Glory of God Heart Total commitment This is the essence of true Christian service, motivated by delight rather than duty. To serve in that way I would judge that I need 3 things: 1.A Passion to serve God 2.An Ability / Possibility to serve God 3.A Power to serve God In chapter 7 I see: 1.A Passion to serve God (7:1-4) 2.An Ability / Possibility to serve God (7:5-13) 3.A Power to serve God (7:14-25) 1.A Passion to serve God (7:1-4) means Freedom from the law 2.An Ability / Possibility to serve God (7:5-13) – in contrast of the failure of being “in the flesh” 3.A Power to serve God (7:14-25) – in contrast to Frustration. Therefore in Romans 7 I also have: 1.Freedom (7:1-4) 2.Failure (7:5-13) 3.Frustration (7:14-25) Looked at positively we see: 1.A Passion to Serve (7:1-4) 2.A Possibility to serve (7:5-13) 3.A Power to Serve (7:14-25) Chp 7:1-4 details a service born out of the passion of relationship A Passion to Serve - Freedom (7:1-4) i.Death releases from the law (v1) "The law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth" - the principle stated The rule or dominion of law extends only to death, as does sin (Rom5:12) In eternity there is no sin and can be no sin for there is no law either! On the surface, a point that is straight forward enough! But the apostle seems to chose a very complex parable as the means of conveying this truth. So complex that some would suggest that Paul has bitten off more than he can chew! That he has mad a bit of a mess of the illustration! In the chapter the believer is freed (7:4), just like the woman but it isn't the woman who dies it is her husband! But the parable illustrates something more than just the basic truth! So some have said the parable is a bit mixed up! A kind of mixed metaphor! Maybe Paul has overstretched himself! Others holding to the inspiration of the Word of God wouldn't maybe just go as far as saying that but would perhaps tacitly acknowledge it by saying, 'don't look too deeply into the parable,' or perhaps that the parable is only meant to illustrate the basic truth, perhaps indicating that underneath the surface the whole illustration is a bit of a mess! But this is the inspired Word of God and "not one jot or title shall pass away" "the Word of God is living and powerful..." Interestingly there are plenty of simple examples that Paul could have used to illustrate his point that the rule of law extends only to death and then law has no more demands upon us: a)Ahithophel - was he ever called to account for betraying the Lord's anointed? No he wasn't! Why? He hung himself! b)Naomi's two sons were they ever dealt with by the law and put out of the congregation of Israel for marrying Moabite girls? No! Why? They both died in Moab! c)Eli's two sons Hophni and Phinehas were they ever broad before the law for fornication? No! Why? They both died in battle! d)Samson and his fornication and adultery? But he doesn't chose a simple illustration, for as we shall see a simple example of this principle just would not have done, it would have been critically lacking in at least 2 perhaps 3 key areas. Pauls example illustrates at least 4 key principles: i.That death releases from the law ii.That in certain circumstances the death of another releases me from law iii.My relationship with another is critical in enjoying that release from law iv.Being released from law by death I am free to serve another That death releases from the law (v1) "The law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth" - the principle states The rule or dominion of law extends only to death, as does sin (Rom5:12) The principle stated is simple enough That in certain circumstances the death of another releases me from law(v2,4) Death releases me from the rule of law In the parable however the death is not my death, the death of the woman, but the death of another! Has Paul got mixed up? Actually this point is quite consistent with the context of Romans so far In chp 3+4 we came into blessing; the blessing of justification by faith, through death, the death of another! In chp 5 Divine Grace was poured out, through the death of another. In chp 6 our consecration to God was made possible because of our identification with Christ in His death – the death of another. Not only is it the case that death frees from the law but that death is significantly the death of another! Notice how that release by death occurs. Our simple illustrations would again be inadequate here. This is not release from the law in the same way that perhaps Hophni and Phinehas, Ahithophel, Naomis sons or Samson were released from the law. This is not the release of a guilty party because of the weakness of the law, unable to pursue the sinner beyond death. In our parable, significantly, it is the release of a guiltless individual who is now regarded as having fulfilled all legal obligations and death has now brought the claims of law to an end. This is the release of the righteous rather than the unrighteous! “For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.” (2Co 5:21) “Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.” (Rom 3:28) My relationship with another is critical in enjoying that release from law My relationship with another who is dead to the law in certain exceptional circumstances can affect my status before the law too! The death of another to the law can release me! I think in the context of Roms 4 to 6 this is highly significant! The nature of that relationship is also very interesting: marriage relationship! Right the way through the NT scriptures the relationship between Christ and His church is consistently viewed as a marriage relationship: (Eph 5:24ff; Rev21). In verse 4 we are "dead to the law" but it is by the "body of Christ" - the death of another! Notice the logic of verse 4: “Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God” Notice that nothing less than the “body of Christ” is needed to break me free from the demands of the law! The theme of redemption in scripture: the person of Christ, the work of Calvary, the sacrifice of the lamb, the sufferings of Christ (Ps22; Ps69; Isa53) all of this mighty work and sacrifice impacts upon my life at this point! To release me from that which binds me that I might be free to “bring forth fruit unto God.” What is this fruit? “But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.” (Rom 6:22) Holiness is no add on to Christianity Holiness is no after thought on Gods part to Christian experience Holiness is the very essence of Christian experience! Holiness is the impression of Calvary upon my being! Being released from law by death I am free to serve another In this complex parable of death releasing us from the law we see illustrated a point that could not be illustrated by a simple example of the death of the accused releasing him from the rule of law: (a)Ahithophel - what happened next? - Nothing he's dead. (b)Naomis' two sons - what happened next, after they were released from the law? Nothing - they were dead! (c)Eli's two sons - what happened to them next after they had been released from the law? Nothing - they were dead. But in the parable of Romans 7 after the release from the law there is a 'what happened next...' The woman released from the law is ready to move on and be married to another (7:4) And in our case: "that we should bring forth fruit unto God" (7:4) So this death is not simply an end but a beginning! Only because of the complex nature of this illustration is this point possible! Some take 7:1-4 to indicate that divorce and remarriage effectively exclude people from assembly fellowship (7:3) That interpretation sheds more light on the thinking of those who teach it than it does on the teaching of scripture on divorce and remarriage! The teaching in this section relative to the woman marrying another is whilst she is "bound by the law." There is no provision in the law for operation of Divine Grace. Those who draw their teaching on divorce and remarriage from this section likewise draw no provision from Divine Grace. The conclusion of this section brings us to our true standing today of being "dead to the law" (7:4) and in our dealings with men and women we must likewise recognise that there is likewise "therefore now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus." There is good indication elsewhere that people from a background of divorce and remarriage were received into assembly fellowship: 1 Tim2; 1 Co7, John 4. Salvation isn't the end it is the beginning! Once you are save, you haven't 'done it' but rather God has 'begun it.' https://graceinchrist.org/romans
Site Meter